charging-cabinet/software/h5-uniapp/.agents/skills/vue-best-practices/reference/slot-renderless-components-vs-composables.md
12451 b553c4e519 feat: API 统一 + 设备详情补全 + H5 导航优化
- API 路由统一: 移除 /api/h5/,统一 /api/pms/ 入口
- 二进制改名: api-server -> pms-api(与服务名一致)
- nginx: 合并 /api/ + /pms/api/ 为 /api/pms/
- 新增 docs/API.md 接口文档
- 后端: CabinetDetail 增加 rssi/pow_fail/address/soc 等字段
- Redis 管道批量读取仓体实时数据(SOC/电压/电流/功率)
- DB: 所有 TIMESTAMP 列改为 DATETIME(修复类型不匹配)
- 用户管理: 新增创建时间/修改时间列,状态改用 Switch
- 角色管理/用户管理: 操作按钮改为图标
- PC 设备详情: 基本信息补全 RSSI/ICCID/电源/地址
- PC 卡片: 通道统计改用 Lucide 图标,颜色统一
- PC 二维码: canvas 渲染,含编号文字,支持右键下载
- H5: 按 uni-app 规范修正导航(navigateTo 替代 reLaunch)
- H5: 详情页加返回导航条
- H5: 扫码支持摄像头(jsQR)+ ?id= 参数
- H5: 底部 tabBar 在所有页面常显
- H5: 首页统计改为 6 项(设备/通道/空闲/充电/充满/故障)
- H5: 下拉刷新 / 上拉加载
- 产品首页: 添加业务联系
- 文档: 清理过时文件,补充缺失规范章节
2026-07-04 04:03:02 +08:00

4.1 KiB

title, impact, impactDescription, type, tags
title impact impactDescription type tags
Consider Composables Instead of Renderless Components MEDIUM Renderless slot components add overhead compared to composables for pure logic reuse best-practice
vue3
slots
renderless-components
composables
performance
composition-api

Consider Composables Instead of Renderless Components

Impact: MEDIUM - Renderless components (components that only expose logic via scoped slots without rendering their own UI) were a popular pattern in Vue 2 for logic reuse. In Vue 3, Composition API composables are often more efficient and simpler for the same use case.

Task Checklist

  • Evaluate if a composable can replace a renderless component
  • Use renderless components when slot-based composition is genuinely needed
  • Prefer composables for pure logic/state sharing
  • Consider component overhead vs function overhead

Renderless Component Pattern:

<!-- MouseTracker.vue - Renderless component -->
<script setup>
import { ref, onMounted, onUnmounted } from 'vue'

const x = ref(0)
const y = ref(0)

function update(event) {
  x.value = event.pageX
  y.value = event.pageY
}

onMounted(() => window.addEventListener('mousemove', update))
onUnmounted(() => window.removeEventListener('mousemove', update))
</script>

<template>
  <!-- Only renders the slot, no DOM of its own -->
  <slot :x="x" :y="y" />
</template>
<!-- Usage -->
<MouseTracker v-slot="{ x, y }">
  <div>Mouse: {{ x }}, {{ y }}</div>
</MouseTracker>

Composable Alternative (Recommended):

// composables/useMouse.ts
import { ref, onMounted, onUnmounted } from 'vue'

export function useMouse() {
  const x = ref(0)
  const y = ref(0)

  function update(event: MouseEvent) {
    x.value = event.pageX
    y.value = event.pageY
  }

  onMounted(() => window.addEventListener('mousemove', update))
  onUnmounted(() => window.removeEventListener('mousemove', update))

  return { x, y }
}
<!-- Usage - simpler, no extra component -->
<script setup>
import { useMouse } from '@/composables/useMouse'

const { x, y } = useMouse()
</script>

<template>
  <div>Mouse: {{ x }}, {{ y }}</div>
</template>

When to Use Each Pattern

Pattern Best For
Composables Pure logic reuse, state management, side effects
Renderless Components When slot composition is needed, wrapper logic with flexible children

Use Composables When:

  • Sharing reactive state and methods
  • Encapsulating side effects (event listeners, timers)
  • No need for template slot composition
  • Maximum performance is needed

Use Renderless Components When:

  • Need to provide context/data to arbitrary slot content
  • Building provider components (like context providers)
  • The slot composition pattern is genuinely useful
  • Building component libraries with maximum flexibility

Real-World Examples

Composable is Better:

// Data fetching
export function useFetch<T>(url: string) {
  const data = ref<T | null>(null)
  const error = ref<Error | null>(null)
  const loading = ref(true)
  // ... fetch logic
  return { data, error, loading }
}

// Form validation
export function useForm(initialValues) {
  const values = ref(initialValues)
  const errors = ref({})
  const validate = () => { /* ... */ }
  return { values, errors, validate }
}

Renderless Component is Better:

<!-- Virtualized list that needs to wrap arbitrary item rendering -->
<VirtualScroller :items="items" :item-height="50">
  <template #default="{ item, style }">
    <!-- Consumer controls how each item renders -->
    <div :style="style" class="custom-item">
      {{ item.name }}
    </div>
  </template>
</VirtualScroller>

Performance Consideration

Renderless components still:

  • Create a component instance
  • Go through the Vue component lifecycle
  • Have reactive overhead

Composables are just functions:

  • No component instance overhead
  • Direct reactive primitives
  • Smaller bundle size

Reference