12451 b553c4e519 feat: API 统一 + 设备详情补全 + H5 导航优化
- API 路由统一: 移除 /api/h5/,统一 /api/pms/ 入口
- 二进制改名: api-server -> pms-api(与服务名一致)
- nginx: 合并 /api/ + /pms/api/ 为 /api/pms/
- 新增 docs/API.md 接口文档
- 后端: CabinetDetail 增加 rssi/pow_fail/address/soc 等字段
- Redis 管道批量读取仓体实时数据(SOC/电压/电流/功率)
- DB: 所有 TIMESTAMP 列改为 DATETIME(修复类型不匹配)
- 用户管理: 新增创建时间/修改时间列,状态改用 Switch
- 角色管理/用户管理: 操作按钮改为图标
- PC 设备详情: 基本信息补全 RSSI/ICCID/电源/地址
- PC 卡片: 通道统计改用 Lucide 图标,颜色统一
- PC 二维码: canvas 渲染,含编号文字,支持右键下载
- H5: 按 uni-app 规范修正导航(navigateTo 替代 reLaunch)
- H5: 详情页加返回导航条
- H5: 扫码支持摄像头(jsQR)+ ?id= 参数
- H5: 底部 tabBar 在所有页面常显
- H5: 首页统计改为 6 项(设备/通道/空闲/充电/充满/故障)
- H5: 下拉刷新 / 上拉加载
- 产品首页: 添加业务联系
- 文档: 清理过时文件,补充缺失规范章节
2026-07-04 04:03:02 +08:00

3.8 KiB

title, impact, impactDescription, type, tags
title impact impactDescription type tags
Never Use v-if and v-for on the Same Element HIGH Causes confusing precedence issues and Vue 2 to 3 migration bugs capability
vue3
v-if
v-for
conditional-rendering
list-rendering
eslint

Never Use v-if and v-for on the Same Element

Impact: HIGH - Using v-if and v-for on the same element creates ambiguous precedence that differs between Vue 2 and Vue 3. In Vue 2, v-for had higher precedence; in Vue 3, v-if has higher precedence. This breaking change causes subtle bugs during migration and makes code intent unclear.

The ESLint rule vue/no-use-v-if-with-v-for enforces this best practice.

Task Checklist

  • Never place v-if and v-for on the same element
  • For filtering list items: use a computed property that filters the array
  • For hiding entire list: wrap with <template v-if> around the v-for
  • Enable eslint-plugin-vue rule vue/no-use-v-if-with-v-for

Incorrect:

<!-- WRONG: v-if and v-for on same element - ambiguous precedence -->
<template>
  <!-- Intent: show only active users -->
  <li v-for="user in users" v-if="user.isActive" :key="user.id">
    {{ user.name }}
  </li>
</template>
<!-- WRONG: Hiding entire list conditionally -->
<template>
  <li v-for="user in users" v-if="shouldShowList" :key="user.id">
    {{ user.name }}
  </li>
</template>
<!-- WRONG: Vue 3 precedence issue -->
<template>
  <!-- In Vue 3, v-if runs FIRST, so 'user' is undefined! -->
  <li v-for="user in users" v-if="user.isActive" :key="user.id">
    {{ user.name }}
  </li>
  <!-- Error: Cannot read property 'isActive' of undefined -->
</template>

Correct:

<!-- CORRECT: Filter with computed property -->
<template>
  <li v-for="user in activeUsers" :key="user.id">
    {{ user.name }}
  </li>
</template>

<script setup>
import { computed } from 'vue'

const props = defineProps(['users'])

const activeUsers = computed(() =>
  props.users.filter(user => user.isActive)
)
</script>
<!-- CORRECT: Wrap with <template v-if> for conditional list -->
<template>
  <template v-if="shouldShowList">
    <li v-for="user in users" :key="user.id">
      {{ user.name }}
    </li>
  </template>
</template>
<!-- CORRECT: v-if inside the loop (per-item condition) -->
<template>
  <ul>
    <template v-for="user in users" :key="user.id">
      <li v-if="user.isActive">
        {{ user.name }}
      </li>
    </template>
  </ul>
</template>

Vue 2 vs Vue 3 Precedence Change

// Vue 2: v-for evaluated first
// <li v-for="user in users" v-if="user.isActive">
// Equivalent to: users.forEach(user => { if (user.isActive) render(user) })

// Vue 3: v-if evaluated first
// <li v-for="user in users" v-if="user.isActive">
// Equivalent to: if (user.isActive) users.forEach(user => render(user))
// Problem: 'user' doesn't exist yet when v-if runs!

Why Computed Properties Are Better

// Benefits of filtering via computed:
// 1. Clear separation of concerns (logic vs template)
// 2. Cached - only recalculates when dependencies change
// 3. Reusable - can be used elsewhere in component
// 4. Testable - can unit test the filtering logic
// 5. No ambiguity about intent

const activeUsers = computed(() =>
  users.value.filter(u => u.isActive)
)

// Can add more complex filtering
const filteredUsers = computed(() =>
  users.value
    .filter(u => u.isActive)
    .filter(u => u.role === selectedRole.value)
    .sort((a, b) => a.name.localeCompare(b.name))
)

Reference