- API 路由统一: 移除 /api/h5/,统一 /api/pms/ 入口 - 二进制改名: api-server -> pms-api(与服务名一致) - nginx: 合并 /api/ + /pms/api/ 为 /api/pms/ - 新增 docs/API.md 接口文档 - 后端: CabinetDetail 增加 rssi/pow_fail/address/soc 等字段 - Redis 管道批量读取仓体实时数据(SOC/电压/电流/功率) - DB: 所有 TIMESTAMP 列改为 DATETIME(修复类型不匹配) - 用户管理: 新增创建时间/修改时间列,状态改用 Switch - 角色管理/用户管理: 操作按钮改为图标 - PC 设备详情: 基本信息补全 RSSI/ICCID/电源/地址 - PC 卡片: 通道统计改用 Lucide 图标,颜色统一 - PC 二维码: canvas 渲染,含编号文字,支持右键下载 - H5: 按 uni-app 规范修正导航(navigateTo 替代 reLaunch) - H5: 详情页加返回导航条 - H5: 扫码支持摄像头(jsQR)+ ?id= 参数 - H5: 底部 tabBar 在所有页面常显 - H5: 首页统计改为 6 项(设备/通道/空闲/充电/充满/故障) - H5: 下拉刷新 / 上拉加载 - 产品首页: 添加业务联系 - 文档: 清理过时文件,补充缺失规范章节
2.8 KiB
2.8 KiB
Async Components with keep-alive Ref Issues
Rule
When using <keep-alive>, <component>, and defineAsyncComponent together, be aware that template refs can become undefined when the component is re-activated after being deactivated.
Why This Matters
This is a known Vue issue where the ref binding works correctly on first activation but becomes undefined on subsequent activations. This can cause runtime errors when trying to access component methods or properties through refs.
Problem Scenario
<script setup>
import { ref, defineAsyncComponent } from 'vue'
const AsyncWidget = defineAsyncComponent(() =>
import('./Widget.vue')
)
const currentComponent = ref(AsyncWidget)
const widgetRef = ref(null)
function callWidgetMethod() {
// May be undefined after component reactivation!
widgetRef.value?.doSomething()
}
</script>
<template>
<keep-alive>
<component :is="currentComponent" ref="widgetRef" />
</keep-alive>
</template>
Workarounds
Option 1: Use onActivated to re-establish ref access
<script setup>
import { ref, defineAsyncComponent, onActivated, nextTick } from 'vue'
const AsyncWidget = defineAsyncComponent(() =>
import('./Widget.vue')
)
const currentComponent = ref(AsyncWidget)
const widgetRef = ref(null)
// Use a computed or method that waits for ref to be available
async function callWidgetMethod() {
await nextTick()
if (widgetRef.value) {
widgetRef.value.doSomething()
}
}
</script>
Option 2: Avoid mixing all three patterns
If possible, use one of these alternatives:
<!-- Option A: Don't use keep-alive with async components -->
<template>
<component :is="currentComponent" ref="widgetRef" />
</template>
<!-- Option B: Use static component with keep-alive -->
<script setup>
import Widget from './Widget.vue' // Regular import
</script>
<template>
<keep-alive>
<component :is="Widget" ref="widgetRef" />
</keep-alive>
</template>
Option 3: Use provide/inject instead of refs
<!-- Parent.vue -->
<script setup>
import { provide, ref } from 'vue'
const sharedState = ref({ /* shared data */ })
provide('widgetState', sharedState)
</script>
<!-- Widget.vue (async component) -->
<script setup>
import { inject } from 'vue'
const widgetState = inject('widgetState')
</script>
Key Points
- This is a known issue when combining
<keep-alive>,<component :is>, anddefineAsyncComponent - Refs may become undefined after component deactivation/reactivation
- Use
nextTickand null checks when accessing refs - Consider alternative patterns like provide/inject for cross-component communication
- Test thoroughly when using this combination